bxorain wrote:
Z Max - That's interesting you say that cause Dylan actually says the opposite. He claims he was getting sloppy and care free and then when he went on tour with the Dead and said he felt a bit guilty. He says they were doing a better job than he was himself with his own songs...says that tour changed the course of his career because he rededicated himself to his music.
Doesn't really have much relation to what I was saying. Unless of course, like most artists, they have a poor track record with revisionism and taking themselves out of context of time, place, etc. I mean...I'm not arguing with Dylan about his feelings. They were certainly genuine, but it really is inconsequential to what I was saying. The GD were playing Dylan songs 20-30 years old. Whether Dylan was then getting sloppy and nonchalant, decades later, is another conversation all together. What Dylan did with his songs at the time they were written and subsequently toured or whatever, is far removed -and unequivocally for myself- far beyond anything anyone else ever did with them. And like I said, I don't even really care for after he went electric. For this conversation, I care even less for what the GD (and Furthur) did with his songs. Buzzkills in concerts already pretty damn lean with greatness. That shouldn't be misinterpreted with me thinking GD shows of the 80s sucked. They were just so inconsistent and spotty that throwing in a drab Dylan cover was like twisting the arrow in an already gaping wound. So, Dylan self-admitting he was butchering his songs by 1987 doesn't do a thing to counter the opinion that the GD were also butchering Dylan songs in 1987. They can both be true and not in opposition.
EDIT: not rhetorical and a question for Dylanites. Isn't he notorious for having whacky opinions of himself, his music and twisted recollection of his own life? Maybe I'm confusing him with someone else.