newyawker wrote:
spring mountain high wrote:
it's basic math...the fewer people you can fit in, the higher you need to charge to cover expenses and make a profit...i doubt they're making a ton of dough on these gigs, but they have to cover a bunch of fixed costs and they have a right to make a living, and you have a right not to buy the ticket
eta: it's kind of lame to complain about prices when they just gave us four free HD gigs...so let me say this:
THANK YOU, BOB, PHIL AND FURTHUR
James, we can discuss things as this without you responding with a non sequitur. I am personally not complaining,nor am I lame. Just observing. I would also like to know what fixed costs you speak of. Do you think Phil and Bob went to a bank to get a loan when they have piles of cash? No cmon. Can we just have a discussion without any logical fallacies?
that was not directed at you...you started the thread, and i jumped in with my $.02...
logical fallacies? ok lol
fixed costs: each gig costs $X to put on...i assume they pay the band members, sound engineers, lighting crew, and all the other venue employees for each show; the money it costs to open the door to the venue, eg utilities, maintenance, taxes etc.; the cost to buy the venue, the cost to equip it for musical performances (i can assure you top-shelf sound and light equipment is not cheap), and the cost to equip it for food and bar service, business licenses (liquor, food etc) all spread over the life of the building, the costs of goods sold during the performance, eg food, drink, and souvenirs...fixed costs, y'know? hardly a fallacy
ipso facto, when you can only cram a hundred people into the space, you will have to have a higher ticket price in order to cover these fixed costs, assuming of course this is not intended to be philanthropic or non-profit venture on the part of band members and employees
and your prerogative as a consumer is to not buy a ticket should you feel the price too high