I know; the first time this Judicial body is in session in many moons, and I am late. I am not sure I understand what this case is about, though far be it from me to let a little thing like that stop me from putting in my 2 cents. When I was younger (so much younger than today) I would have sided with the young timers. I would have placed into evidence the well know legal axiom (us vs them) "never trust anyone over 20." Now that I am Old (and in the way), I sight as legal precedent (aka) Prankster proverb 23.7, which states "never trust a prankster." I will make a minor change (sleight edit) here. The collary to PP23.7 will hereby read "Never trust anyone."
It is obvious (at least to me) that both the young timers and old timers are guily as sin; both should be drawn an quartered. Next case plz.
Side note: While the monkeys may be a bit rambunctious, they r so cute. I think they should be given a raise. Or at least a few more bananas.
It is obvious (at least to me) that both the young timers and old timers are guily as sin; both should be drawn an quartered. Next case plz.
Side note: While the monkeys may be a bit rambunctious, they r so cute. I think they should be given a raise. Or at least a few more bananas.

